Friday, March 11, 2016

Weeks 1-3 at Embry Riddle: A Lot Happened

Hello Readers!
About time I put something on here again.
So first I'm going to talk about my project, what exactly I'm doing, how I'm doing it, etc. Some parts I will go further in depth with later. Then, I'm going to talk about my general experience actually doing the project. Here we go!

At the beginning of my project, I knew little about how physicists go about discovering “the secrets of the universe.” They can’t exactly just observe black holes in their natural habitats like you would a troupe of chimpanzees. Instead, physicists often have to observe the universe as if the chimpanzees are invisible and all they can see is how the chimps affect the space around them. Like if some physicists saw a floating banana slowly peel itself and disappear at a rate within the accepted range for chimpanzee consumption, they might think, “Hmm, that there might be a chimp.”

Same deal with the universe. In fact, the discovery of gravitational waves was so exciting mostly because now we can use gravitational waves to observe other aspects of the universe. That’s actually what I’m doing with my project. Physicists think there are these things in the universe called cosmic strings. They are hypothetical objects made of mass-energy that formed in the early universe during phase transitions. In the beginning, these strings were smaller than quarks, but as the universe expanded, the strings expanded. They’re a lot like the lines you see in ice when it cools from liquid, except cosmic strings can stretch, interact, oscillate, and disintegrate. These mass-energy strings are extremely dense—just a 1.6 km long string would be as massive as earth. They are also one-dimensional—no height or width. If cosmic strings existed, they could give us valuable insights into the early universe, so scientists have been trying to detect them. One of the most promising ways to find cosmic strings would be to detect the gravitational waves they emit when they decay. As explained by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration, “Gravitational-wave emission is the main mechanism for cosmic strings to dissipate energy. When a string in a cosmic string network crosses itself, a loop separates from the string. Once formed, a loop is doomed. It oscillates, radiates gravitationally, shrinks and eventually evaporates. Strong gravitational emission occurs at the pinch-off points of the loop, the cusps, which move with a velocity [expected to be] the speed of light. Powerful bursts of gravitational waves are expected to be produced by cosmic string cusps. The amplitude of the signal depends on the tension in the string and the size of the loop. These signals could be detected by the ground-based laser interferometers, LIGO and Virgo.”

            But before we start sifting through data collected from LIGO and Virgo, we need to know what the interferometer can measure (not all the features of these cosmic strings may be equally easy to measure). The gravitational waves emitted from cosmic strings have a mathematical form with depends on physical parameters, such as amplitude, lower frequency, and higher frequency.

It is also important to understand that the noise in LIGO depends on the frequency. We want signals to have as little noise as possible because with less noise the actual signal is much more prominent. In other words, we want a high signal to noise ratio (SNR). See the graph below:

Graph explanation: As you can see, between approximately 10^2 and 10^2.5 Hz, LIGO and Virgo experience the lowest noise spectral densities (approximately between 10^-22 to 10^-23 1/(Hz)^1/2). The lower noise spectral density, the lower the noise, and thus, signals that are between 10^2 and 10^2.5 Hz give LIGO and Virgo scientists the most precise data. 

 The goal of my project is to understand how precisely the laser interferometers can measure these physical parameters. These errors in turn will tell us which physical conclusions LIGO will be able to make and which are beyond the current reach of the instrument. Just to give an analogy, when people tested the prediction of general relativity that light from distant galaxies get bent by the sun (gravitational lensing), it was necessary to have sufficient precision in measuring the trajectories to distinguish between general relativity and Newton's gravitational theory.

The work will involve first estimating the error with a technique called the Inverse Fisher Matrix approach. Then we will use a more accurate technique (which is also computationally much more intensive) developed by Dr. Zanolin, which uses asymptotic expansions of the covariance matrix of maximum likelihood estimators. The idea is to compare the prediction of these analytical studies with previous studies that were performed with computer simulations done by X. Siemens et al.

So that is what my project is all about. So how has it been going in practice? First, I've had to learn SO much stuff. I've had to learn new math and some programming (although my work buddy does most of the programming) and of course, lots about cosmology and gravitation. Here are some of the topics I've had to learn to do my calculations:
general info about LIGO and gravitational waves
cosmic strings: what are they and how do they work?
inverse matrices
estimation theory, maximum likelihood error, and cramer rao bound
dirac delta functions
fourier transforms
gamma functions and incomplete gamma functions
gaussian distributions
noise spectral density
how to use Mathematica

I don't even completely understand all these topics yet. Some I'm still learning as I go, but basically, my brain has been exploding. But it's pretty great. Also, it's cool to see how the math we learn in school is actually applied to learn things about the universe. Yes, calculus is actually used in the real world. And I didn't realize there is so much math I haven't learned yet. I remember thinking in 5th grade that once you've learned calculus, you've basically learned everything. Ha was I wrong! There is a lot more math out there I haven't even heard of, but now, I'm having to use a tiny fraction of this more advanced math, which really makes me realize how much I haven't learned. 

Well, that's enough for now. In my next post, I'm going to talk about the people I've been working with because they're pretty awesome! But anyhow, ciao!

Carissa




Tuesday, February 16, 2016

My Blog Title Definitely Wasn't Wrong-- Thoughts on the Detection of Gravitational Waves

Sooo.... gravitational waves have officially been detected.

It was announced Thursday. I'm sorry I didn't update this then, I really didn't feel like just explaining the whole deal. Because, man, that would be a lot of explaining to do, in my own words, when there's already so much written about it already. But then about five minutes ago, as I was about to fall asleep, I thought, why not just do a reflection and reaction? I mean, I do have some things to say. So that's what I'm gonna do.

Ok, but first, I feel like if you haven't read up, I'm not making much sense. Here, PLEASE read these articles!! They explain everything really well, I don't think I could do better on this blog






That last one is a NYT opinion article, which I just read and which actually just inspired me to do the reflection.


For me, the detection is mind blowing on so many different levels. For one, it's crazy that I've been actually reading up on gravitational waves and the graviton for a while now, crazy that I'm doing my SRP project on THIS TOPIC, and then BAM, HUGE HUGE HUGE SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY PERTAINING TO THE TOPIC I'VE BEEN EXPLORING HAPPENS!!! LIKE WHAT!?! Now gravitational waves are all over the national news, international news, Facebook... This finding was going to be revolutionary regardless of when it was found, but the fact that it was found NOW??? That's crazy. Because in order for the waves to be detected, you have to have a huge redistribution of mass happening somewhere in the universe, which is hard to find, but we found one and registered it and... only a little after LIGO was updated, too, just weeks after the updates. It's actually pretty lucky the gravitational waves (GW) were detected this soon. So props to the universe for being timely. But more craziness about timeliness, the black holes collided (did you read those articles??? 'Cause I ain't explaining!!) about 1.2 BILLION years ago. And even MORE craziness about time, the signal only lasted for 20 thousandths of a second. A wave 20 thousandths of a second long from 1.2 billion years ago happened to ripple through earth just in time for LIGO to detect it and just in time for me to be doing my SRP on this subject. Seems pretty amazingly perfect to me.

But speaking of perfection, holy guacamole, those instruments are SENSITIVE. They can detect a difference in the size of the tunnels (due to the warping from the gravitational waves) of less than one ten-thousandth the size of a single proton. That's right, proton.  As Lawrence Krauss from the New York Times noted in his opinion article "Finding Beauty in the Darkness," "This difference is so small that even the minuscule motion in the position of each mirror at the end of each tunnel because of quantum mechanical vibrations of the atoms in the mirror could have overwhelmed the signal. But scientists were able to resort to the most modern techniques in quantum optics to overcome this." You've got to be just astonished at the technological advances we have reached thus far that allow us to detect changes one-thousandth the size of a proton. And also to detect a change this tiny without interference from the outside world. If I were typing this blog post inside the LIGO tunnels while they were receiving the signal, I would've ruined everything with my super disruptive clickclickclicking on the keys. I also would be dead since it's a vacuum in there. But anyhow, everything about LIGO is crazily amazing and crazily advanced. The mirrors are suspended by glass thread and insulated in layers of metal and concrete by the tunnels. Can we just take a moment to appreciate the people who designed and built, calibrated and calculated everything pertaining to LIGO? Because of our technology, detecting gravitational waves is now possible.

There are so many more amazing numbers and facts pertaining to GW and the black holes (one 36X the size our sun, the other 29X) but if you've read the articles you saw them. They're not just numbers. If you really think about them, they're insane, seemingly impossible ( like two colossal black holes spinning around each other at 30 times per second??? ), but they are our reality.

In that NYT opinion article, Krauss opens up with the lines, "WITH presidential primaries in full steam, with the country wrapped up in concern about the economy, immigration and terrorism, one might wonder why we should care about the news of a minuscule jiggle produced by an event in a far corner of the universe." But for me as a child, the question was always the other way around. Do our day to day struggles and the stories on the radio have any significance in relation to our great grand universe? Over the years, I've developed a greater awareness and appreciation for the close-to-home issues, but I still always try to keep things in perspective. The black hole collision unleashed a peak power 50 times the power output of all the stars in the universe combined. If that doesn't make you feel small, I don't know what will. But at the same time, once the waves reached LIGO, they registered as only quiet chirps, something we would've never noticed if we weren't paying attention. For something that large to get dispersed into something that small really says something about the vastness of our universe. But also, it shows that even the greatest, most colossal of events eventually fade into almost nothing. In the grandest of grand schemes of things, everything becomes insignificant with time, from black hole collisions to you and me. While matter and energy are neither created nor destroyed, entropy will eventually break down all objects and events into one meaningless everything with no defined edges, nothing to distinguish one point in space-time from another.

But the thing is, if you go about living your life in despair because we all inevitably, as said by Shakespeare's Hamlet, "returneth to dust," you're missing the point. The universe and life and everything is not meant to be mourned, but marveled. While, yes, from one perspective, all of space-time is tiny and insignificant, you must remember that you have a perspective, too, that is just as valid, if not more valid than the universal perspective. We as humans cannot perceive everything, no. We cannot perceive every birth, every death, every cataclysmic event, every star, every grain of dust, every moment in time from the beginning to end. But we can perceive what's important. From our very human perspectives, the universe is meaningful. People around the world have cried and gawked and celebrated these "insignificant" chirps emitted from two black holes 1.2 billion years ago.  We can feel emotional about gravitational waves and graduations, caucuses and coffee, because while we can't perceive everything, what we do perceive, we make meaningful.

But let us not forget, the story of LIGO is a story about how we strive to expand our perspective. As Szabolcs Marka said, we can now hear the universe, when before we could only see. “Finally, astronomy grew ears. We never had ears before.” With LIGO, we will be able to learn more about black holes and the very beginnings of the universe. We will be able to perceive more. And that is a noble goal. For as long as humans have existed, we've tried to unravel the universe's mysteries. It is true that we are always striving to get closer to the universal perspective. But will we ever get there? With each new mystery solved, new ones arise. With the discovery of the gravitational wave, we now only have more questions about the big bang and black holes, not less. But that's what makes science so fun. Why do we strive to reach the universal perspective, even if we'll never get there? To make our lives more meaningful, I guess. For me, the more I know, the more I have to appreciate.

But ahh, now I feel like I just contradicted that last paragraph. I'm still figuring this out. For now, I'm gonna go to school!

Have a nice day! :)

Carissa






Friday, February 5, 2016

Defying Gravity!

Dear Readers,

Hello! You've entered the Lair of the one and only Carissa Cirelli.
Welcome.

Thank you for stopping by.

So you're probably wondering what I'm researching and where I'm going and who I am and all that. Well, then, let's get down to business.

So I'm Carissa Cirelli, a senior at BASIS Flagstaff and these coming months, I'm going to be researching THE GRAVITON with Dr. Darrel Smith and Dr. Michele Zanolin down at Embry Riddle in Prescott. What's the graviton, you ask?

Basically, it's not a real word, according to this blog's spell check. And technically, it's not a real particle either, because it hasn't yet been discovered. The graviton is a hypothetical particle that mediates the gravitational force. What does that mean?

Well, by mediates, I mean "carries" or "transmits." Part of the reason physicists think the graviton exists is because all the other fundamental forces (the strong force, the weak force, and the electromagnetic force) are mediated by particles. The strong force is mediated by gluons, the weak force by W and Z bosons, and the electromagnetic force by photons. If you've taken a high school physics course, you're probably most familiar with photons and the electromagnetic force. The electromagnetic force occurs in electric fields, magnetic fields, and in light . You've probably heard how light is both a wave and a particle? A photon is the particle form of light, and it is what light is made of. More on all this in the coming blog posts.

So the graviton is analogous to a photon. It is a particle that transmits gravity. It is what gravity is made of (I'm simplifying, but basically).

Taking this analogy further, gravity is also thought to be a wave, just like how light is both a wave and a particle. In addition to being in the form of the graviton, physicists think gravity can be in the form of a wave, the gravitational wave. These gravitational waves ripple out from objects with mass (stars, planets, even us) and distort the space-time fabric.

So that's a little intro on the graviton and the gravitational wave.

So what exactly is Dr. Zanolin researching? Well, Dr. Zanolin is one of the many physicists working on detecting the graviton. He's working with the LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) Scientific Collaboration, a group of more than 1000 scientists worldwide whose aim is to directly detect gravitational waves using the detectors LIGO and GEO600. More info here
http://www.ligo.org/
and here
https://ligo.caltech.edu/page/about

I'll go more into the specifics of Dr. Zanolin's focus over time, but for now, here's his site:
http://mercury.pr.erau.edu/~zanolinm/

And cool article posted today! As you can see, this is a pretty hot topic. I'm super excited!
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/02/woohoo-email-stokes-rumor-gravitational-waves-have-been-spotted

That's all for today, folks. I've got lots yet to explain, from the four fundamental forces to how the LIGO instruments work so I'll be posting all this information over time.

Have a great day! :)

Bibliography:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blogs/physics/2014/05/what-are-gravitons/
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-34815668
http://www.fnal.gov/pub/science/inquiring/questions/graviton.html